
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1993 Mustang Pro+ Brake System Rear 4262294MGFits 1993 Ford Mustang w OE Ford 8. 8" C clip Rear End (4 Lug) Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications Ford Mustang 93 Axle
Fits 1993 Ford Mustang w/OE Ford 8.8" C-clip Rear End (4 Lug)
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | Ford Mustang 93 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Rear |
| Axle Standoff | 2.50IN |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Monster Green |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type | Floating |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter | 13.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE Ford 8.8 C-clip Rear End (4 Lug) |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Park Brake | Yes |
| Includes Park Brake Cables | Yes |
| Lug Count | 4 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 17IN |
| Product Line | 13 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 13 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 - Short Label | WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.100IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Fits 1993 Mustang (Fox), excl. Cobra (see 94-04), with OE 8.8" c-clip rear end & 4 lug axles (Master cylinder upgrade is recommended, see Note below) |
| Template | Q085H |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Rear |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 4x4.25 |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Ford | Mustang |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 2317 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
My mileage on my 2021 Honda CRV dropped 4 miles /gallon with this air filter.
Size: (Pack of 1)
My mileage on my 2021 Honda CRV dropped 4 miles /gallon with this air filter. It did fit well and was easy to install, but then I watched my average around town mileage drop from 29-31mpg to 26-27 mpg thru 2 tank fillups. The Honda repair person said this filter looked like the Honda one and was surprised when we wanted to switch it out. Granted, it looked just like the Honda filter, but the folds on the Honda one are yellowish and I have to think there has to be some difference in the texture. The average mileage went back up within 10 miles of replacing it and 3 fill ups later it has continuously maintained its original average of 29-31 with the Honda filter.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2024
★★★★★ 5
As good as Original Manufacturer Equipment.
Size: (Pack of 1)
Cheaper than having the dealer or oil change store do it. Only takes a minute to replace your existing filter for a lot less than what they want to charge you. High quality too!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent Honda Alternative
Size: (Pack of 1)
I try to get everything and to keep everything as a manufacturer original on a car as possible. I will say that this filter is just as good as the Honda. The installation was very simple, you just need a screw driver to unscrew the 4 screws in the air box and this sits right in. The engine ran better and immediately got so much better MPG. I did not notice the engine struggling for air at all, if anything the car ran better. The fitment was the same size and just as good as the Honda.
P.S Don't be like me. Don't hesitate to buy it. You'll love it. No questions asked!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Perfect it for my 2022 Honda CRV
Size: (Pack of 1)
According to the Honda dealership, my 2022 Honda CR-V needed a replacement air filter. I watched a few YouTube videos to see how difficult the installation would be, and it looked quite simple.
I researched online and found the Ecogard Premium Air Filter on Amazon, which had very good reviews.
As a woman with no mechanical experience, I was surprised to find that it took me less than 10 minutes to install the new filter. It fit perfectly, and I saved money by purchasing it from Amazon and doing the installation myself. The Honda dealer would have charged me over $100 just for the installation.
I highly recommend the Ecogard Premium Air Filter for a 2022 Honda CR-V.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Will see
Size: (Pack of 1)
Fits perfect size
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2026